eProcurement Delivers
Performance improvement through e-procurement is readily apparent, as evidenced in the table below, which highlights the average performance improvements generated as a result of e-procurement implementation.
There remains a considerable difference, however, between the benefits
realised by the top performing enterprises and those at the other
end of the scale. The table below summarises some key findings and
defines best-in-class performance.
The Power of Internal Collaboration
If you attended Wax Digital's 10:10 seminar at
eWorld this week you'll be familiar with our thoughts on how important
the collaborative element of electronic purchasing is. It's an opinion
borne out by the report, as can be seen below:
Organisations that actively encourage collaboration
between internal stakeholders display greater spend under management,
leading to increased savings, better process efficiency, and greater
compliance.
|
|
Organisations with a purchasing function rated
as best-in-class:
- Display a requisition-to-order cycle time which is less that
¼ that of the average organisation
- Place 88% of spend under management, more than twice that of
the average
- Have 31% less maverick spend than their peers
Aberdeen's 2007 study for 'The CFO's View of Procurement'
found that the average enterprise identified savings of 11.9%, but
could only book 3.2% in its financial statements, indicating a savings
leakage of 73%.
This benchmark report shows that best-in-class continue to outperform
the laggards by 3:2 when it comes to % of spend under management,
underlining again the importance of a holistic approach to purchasing
technology that marries sourcing with effective procure-to-pay solutions.

|